The 20th Anniversary of DS9

Happy 20th Anniversary to DS9. You were, and are, the best of the Star Trek universe. You premiered just as I entered adolescence  concluded just as I left it. You will always have an exceedingly special place in my heart and mind. (Right next to the wormhole that is my soul.)  StarTrek.com has a look back at “Emissary” twenty years later. And io9 did the same thing. (The “31 flavors” line in the first article really just called out a Section 31 reference for me.) Also, it’s a perfect time to mention this since Tor apparently wants you to know that Star Trek novels are good for you.

(Yes, of course, I watched “Emissary” as it aired in real time, twenty years ago.)

Misfits Has Become Rather Misfitted

Okay, seriously, what is up with the fourth season of Misfits? Like, what’s the point, really?

The first season found its footing after a little bit of a struggle and it led to the really good second season which lead to the mostly good third season, which really should just have been the end of the series. Trying to continue into a fourth season with most of the likable and interesting characters all gone is pretty silly. (To put it mildly.) That show introduces too many new people I’m supposed to be interested in and care about and for no reason other than to show a revolving door of youthful people who get into trouble who somehow have more and more convenient excuses to roam the realm of superpower endowed people. I’m glad the show was made and I think it can still offer some small moments of interest but really, there’s no need to keep it going. Unfortunately, this is the problem of successful television. If it’s good, they find ways to keep it going because it makes money, even if it loses its sponsorship in the process. (To me this has always seemed like a needlessly neutral point of return delivery.)

 

I’ve Seen Everything

I’ve watched most of the second series of Downton Abbey and I think I understand the widespread appeal now. Don’t misunderstand me, because I liked the first series but I did not comprehend why so many people said it was amongst the best television they’d ever seen. The second series, which deals with wartime events and more convoluted relationships is a far more interesting character piece. I suppose the first series was a setup for this level of critique but it could be too much compared to a French novel of the late 19th/early 20th centuries: far too much redundant information. Okay, that’s actually a bit too harsh. Really, I think it was a wonderfully done story but it lacked the spark that would allow me to label it “amazing.” The second series, though, really has the glamorous grittiness that I so completely love about war stories. (This may explain some of my love of M*A*S*H, maybe.)

Now to turn to yet another dorky Star Trek discussion. You know you love it. That’s why you come here.
TNG turned 25 this year. Feeling old yet? Let me give you life advice from the Admiral Dr. Leonard McCoy, who stated in “Encounter at Farpoint”: “What’s so damn troublesome about not having died?” In any case, yes, the still surviving crew of the Enterprises NCC-1701D- and E have reached the quarter century mark. Topless Robot had a fun write-up on 25 Years of Star Trek Conventions that I’d like to direct you to read. It’s not a long read but it does have video and it’s fun if you’re a ST dork.
Naturally, this segues to a number of other Star Trek news items. Come on, I like other things, too, I swear. It just seems that this blog, titled with a Star Wars reference used in an hilarious context in Futurama has an awful lot of Star Trek news. Yeah, yeah. Don’t care. I’m going to talk about it anyway because despite being surrounded by massively nerdy friends, most of them aren’t very up on the Trek lifestyle.
  • The Star Trek proposal image from Reddit actually made me realize how well most of the cast of TNG has done since the show ended. Most of them have had successful careers beyond ST (or even within it as directors, producers, etc.) and they’re generally still very attractive looking people. It’s impressive, actually. (Of course, Patrick Stewart still wins my vote.)
  • I have determined that you are not allowed to say “I have seen every episode of Star Trek” if you do not watch the Animated Series in its entirety. This is probably going to enrage some folks but hey, the AS is now on Netflix streaming so you don’t even have to go out and buy the DVDs. Don’t you feel better now? Also it has, furries. (You know, if you’re into that sort of thing, I guess.)
  • I re-watched a couple of episodes from the first season of TNG, as something of a nostalgic walk. Good lord, most of the early episodes are just awful. Especially when you compare them to the quality that the show delivered in later seasons. This also helps to affirm the reasons why I love DS9 so much. It starts with a bang, ends with a whimper. TNG starts and ends on a frame story (which is a good one) about the exploration of humanity, and it’s just not as instantly powerful. I like dystopian fiction. What can I say? (I like Utopian fiction, too, but DS9 managed to blend those together really well.)
  • Watching TNG from the outset also gave me cause to realize just how many of the key cast have doubles of some kind in the ST universe. It’s kind of surprising. I realize that TOS had the mirror universe and DS9 had the mirror universe (and changeling Bashir) and Voyager had the Species 8472 residual selves, etc. but TNG has a strange variety of “other selves.”
    • Picard has Shinzon, a clone engineered by Romulans (but why exactly?)
    • William Riker has Thomas Riker, created by a transporter accident.
    • Data has Lore and B4. (Sigh all you want at B4; it’s allowed.) Lore and B4 may not be “exactly” other selves but given their positronic brains and the fact that they are created  Androids pretty much puts them in this category. (Especially since B4 is supposed to be the Data mirror to Picard’s Shinzon experience in Nemesis.)
    • Worf has mirror universe Worf. The one who’s hanging out with Intendant Kira and Garak in their alliance against the Terrans.
    • Miles O’Brien, though not specifically a “key” cast member was regular enough to warrant my mentioning of his mirror universe self, Smiley.
    • Tasha Yar has her alternate past self aboard the Enterprise NCC-1701-C  who spawns her half-Romulan daughter Sela. (I don’t think Denise Crosby ever found satisfaction with leaving that show.)
  • And shockingly, only Data and Tasha Yar are dead. All the other key characters survive. (I’ve always liked that Dexter Morgan killed Tasha Yar… er, I mean a nurse played by Denise Crosby. My version is better, if not sounding oddly of fanfic. Also, I have to put a kibash on too many meta references, even if I am friends with someone who has referred to The Prestige as “Wolverine versus Batman” since the trailer first appeared. To be fair, I called This Means War “Kirk Versus Picard at the same time this friend referred to it as “Kirk Versus Bane” because duh, Chris Pine = Kirk and Tom Hardy = Shinzon = Picard.
DS9 turns 20 in January. What was that advice about not feeling old?
Also, I finally had an opportunity to watch the last few episodes of Futurama’s most recent season. Yes, it’s an excuse to call out Patrick Stewart again as the awesome, awesome fox hunter in “31st Century Fox.” I’m sorry, but when the creators behind dorky shows are also huge dorks, they tend to do things that create meta awesome for their fans. The “Where No Fan Has Gone Before” episode of Futurama nearly destroyed me with awesomeness when it aired. (So very long ago…) The fact that Patrick Stewart showed up as a traditional Englishman and chased around a derpy robotic fox while interacting with the characters of my all-time favorite television show… well, that’s just a nerd’s paradise.
And now, much as Patrick Stewart has done, I’ve seen everything!

What to Watch When You’re Watching Watching

It’s so nice to have a laptop that doesn’t fight with my Steam account. Especially since I ended up playing the free Awesomenauts preview this weekend (and getting the game). Maybe I can also finally finish playing Limbo. (To be fair, though, I started that one on XBOX, but still, the portability of being able to play things on my laptop is just insanely nice.)

I was very ill this weekend and all I could do for most of it was lie in bed watching TV. Somehow this led to my watching Neverland. This is the 2011 “prequel” to Peter Pan. I’m a big J.M. Barrie fan (and for works beyond Peter Pan, actually) so I tend to get a little bristly at all things that try to revisit that world without much consideration to the overall meanings. This is, unfortunately, what we call nerd rage. Nonetheless, I wanted to give this movie a fair try. I don’t think it’s bad. What I do think it is is somewhat careless and not always that interesting. The dates and times are accurate enough but you’re going to have a hard time convincing me that a woman commanded a pirate crew in the 1700s and also lived through an additional 200 years in Neverland. This is not because I think women are not qualified but rather because all known information about pirates suggests that they were overwhelmingly male and rejecting of women on their ships. Not to mention that their average captain’s reign was less than two years long. (Typically ending in mutiny, capture, or death.) I don’t think the background story given is as well thought-out as it should have been. Still, it’s pretty and well shot, so it’s not a bad way to kill three hours. (Especially if you cannot move in the slightest from your bed.)

Last weekend it was Skyfall. Skyfall is a little bit boring. Mainly at points when it involves James Bond. Javier Bardem’s character is the best acted and most interesting and scenes with him were far more exciting than scenes with our favorite 007 Daniel Craig. (Sorry to say it.) Also, the film bends over backward to tell us how the “old ways” are dying out and we have to cope with change. This went way too far, often steering into preachy territory. While I really enjoyed the scenes with “Q” there is at least one moment of utter stupidity on his part that unfortunately totally unravels his entire premise of being a technological genius. (Or at least makes it seem exaggerated.) Still, it’s a fun movie to watch and enjoyable enough for an action movie. I just would suggest that you watch it at home when it comes out on DVD rather than spending the money to see it in theaters. Unfortunately for my friends, I also kept asking (far too often) why anyone would trust Voldemort to lead MI6 anyway. (Ralph Fiennes probably would find this irritating too.)

The Armored Adventures of Angst-Ridden Iron Men

I have no idea why I’ve been watching Iron Man: Armored Adventures. Even for a Marvel cartoon show marketed to kids, it’s really not very good (see the quality of Avatar: The Last Airbender as a point of comparison for excellent children’s programming) what with the bad teenage angst and the obnoxiousness of Pepper Potts.  Mostly, it seems an excuse to have a regular kid’s cartoon show with random appearances of Iron Man and related characters. So totally not worth watching. I’ve finished 19 episodes. What is wrong with me?

the tuesday nerd round-up

So, after long-lamenting the lack of literature where kids kill kids, society has finally recognized just how exceedingly common such books are.  All of the Hunger Games books are in my “finished reading” list but until this past week I’d never actually sat down to read Battle Royale. (I love how a Google search for “Hunger Games” or “Battle Royale” also yields the result of “Lord of the Flies” and a bunch of other ‘kids killing kids’ novels.) While the Hunger Games books and Battle Royale certainly have commonalities, they’re not the same. Obviously both evoke a conversation about fighting tyranny and unjust regulations but they do so in different ways.  Without evaluating spoilers, let me just state that I’d happily see both of these side-by-side as examples of a certain genre in much the same way that Frankenstein and Dracula are considered classics of horror/monster literature. (This is not an endorsement of either of those books as being the ‘best’ in said category.)

I recently re-watched the first season of Eureka because it had been years since I saw it and I wanted to move onto later seasons now that it’s all available on Netflix. I really wish that this show had a bigger following because I think more things could be done with it if it had a wider audience. (Anything on the Sci-Fi channel [[note– calling it “SyFy” demeans me as a geek and as a person]] does seem subject to minimal popularity, though.) What makes this show enjoyable isn’t that it’s overly intellectual or that it’s got action so intense that it’s unavoidably tense. What actually does it is the quirkiness of the characters. Even when they’re silly, they’re enjoyable to watch.

Lastly, Caledea. I had a chance to play this last weekend and it’s fun and not terribly difficult to learn. It’s got some flaws, though, in that it doesn’t really leave enough room for skill and strategy once battling begins. The game relies a bit too much on luck and with its limit of four players, this makes it harder to get invested in the early strategizing. I may have won the first game (all of us were first-time players) but I pretty much attribute that to the luck of the dice rolls I made.  (Okay, not entirely, but enough of it was luck that I can’t go around legitimately calling myself the “master of Caledea,” even though that may be what I kept crying out in the immediate aftermath of the game.)  Still, not a bad use of 90 minutes or so. (It may honestly have been longer. I lost track of time.)

i aim to misbehave

Why is it that Malcolm Reynolds is still such a fantastic geek icon despite his extraordinarily limited screen time?

I’m not objecting. I’m actually rather happy that the fourteen episodes (and one movie) that are nearly ten years old are still so popular and such a part of the geek lexicon. I’m just surprised that it’s still the case. I recently got my mother interested in watching Firefly, which was kind of an exciting moment for me because usually our television interests are extraordinarily different.  (Not that she’s exactly on time to this particular party.)

Speaking of getting things “Whedoned” up I know I really should have shared this quite some time ago but here’s a link to the Avengers done in the Firefly style.

I don’t have a good new nerd bite this week. I blame this on being behind on comics, television, movies, and even the internet. Hopefully the next time I’m back in here there will be something more to say.

olde fortran ale

One more week until Futurama returns. I chose to celebrate this by wearing my Planet Express t-shirt and my “Nixon: Now More Than Ever” button, which is a delightful circular joke although I wish I had had that pin in time to wear it for Watchmen in theaters. That button came from a trip to Arizona, sadly, two months after Watchmen was released. Ah well.

I happened to catch a glimpse the other day of someone’s homemade Futurama Operation game.  I love Bender. I really do. But he’s not the only character on Futurama and in some ways it frustrates me that he has become the most iconic association that show has (other than possibly the recent “I don’t want to live on this planet anymore” meme) because it undervalues so many other characters. Fry is infinitely my favorite and Zoidberg is a close second so maybe I have a soft spot all squished up in my heart for Billy West. Nonetheless, this Operation game is pretty impressively adorable. And I suppose if I were really feeling like a dork I could cosplay it up and use some lobster claws to perform ineffective, possibly life-threatening surgery on Mr. Rodriguez’s innards.